High-cycle fatigue behavior and chemical composition empirical relationship of low carbon three-sheet spot-welded joint: An application in automotive industry

Authors

  • Kazem Reza Kashyzadeh Department of Transport, Academy of Engineering, RUDN University Author
  • S Ghorbani Department of Mechanical Engineering Technologies, Academy of Engineering, RUDN University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62676/p7x1cn02

Abstract

In this paper, the authors have attempted to provide an empirical relationship between the fatigue behavior of three-sheet spot-welded joint and the chemical composition of low carbon steel. To this end, the application of this joint in the automotive industry was considered and laboratory samples were prepared based on the actual specifications in the industry, including the raw material (i.e., material and thickness of the primary sheets), the resistance spot welding (RSW) process parameters, and other factors. The results of tensile and quantometric tests along with microscopic observations were utilized to evaluate the raw material and to study the compliance of the steel grade with the required standards. Next, axial cyclic test was performed in order to extract the high-cycle fatigue (HCF) properties of three-sheet spot-welded joint. Finally, a relationship between the number of cycles to failure of the spot-welded joint, repetitive load level, and the percentage of constituent elements was presented by multiple linear regression (MLR) technique. The results showed that the greatest effect of the constituent elements is when we are in the regime of low-cycle fatigue (LCF) and by moving towards the HCF regime, its importance decreases until it becomes almost ineffective in the very-high-cycle fatigue (VHCF) area. In addition, the presented relationship is able to predict the fatigue behavior of three-sheet spot-welded joint via the chemical composition of the primary sheet and the cyclic force with a maximum error of 13.8% compared to the experimental results.

Author Biography

  • Kazem Reza Kashyzadeh, Department of Transport, Academy of Engineering, RUDN University

    Prof. Dr. K. Reza Kashyzadeh is a Professor in the Department of Transport at Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN). In addition, he is the Technical Director of the Mechanical Characteristics Laboratory (MCL) at the Sharif University of Technology (SUT), IRAN. His research interest relies on applied mechanics, solid mechanics, structural integrity, fatigue and fracture, and automotive engineering. Moreover, Prof. K. Reza Kashyzadeh is serving as Subject Editor or Guest Editor for International Journals and participates as a Scientific Committee or Keynote Speaker at a large number of International Conferences. He also won the Cardineli Gold Medal in the field of Research & Development from Italy in 2015. In 2020, he was recognized as a Top Researcher at the mechanical engineering department in the Academy of Engineering, RUDN University. And he was recognized as the youngest professor of the Transport Department in 2022. He is active in the technical committee of the National Standards Organization of Iran in the field of automotive industry. In addition, he has the experience of International cooperation with different countries and leading universities.

     

References

1. J. Guo, Solid state welding processes in manufacturing, In Handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology (2015) 569-592, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4670-4_55.

2. T.R. Mahmood, Q.M. Doos, A.M. AL-Mukhtar, Failure mechanisms and modeling of spot welded joints in low carbon mild sheets steel and high strength low alloy steel, Procedia Structural Integrity 9 (2018) 71–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2018.06.013.

3. K. Reza Kashyzadeh, G.H. Farrahi, M. Minaei, R. Masajedi, M. Gholamnia, M. Shademani, Numerical study of shunting effect in three-steel sheets resistance spot welding, International Journal of Engineering 35(2) (2022) 406-416, https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2022.35.02b.17.

4. ‏A. Habibizadeh, S.I. Golabi, Prediction of fatigue life of spot welding connections subjected to unidirectional dynamic shear load, Modares Mechanical Engineering 14(15) (2015) 361-368, ‏ https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.10275940.1393.14.15.9.6.

5. G.H. Farrahi, A. Ahmadi, K.R. Kashyzadeh, S. Azadi, K. Jahani, A comparative study on the fatigue life of the vehicle body spot welds using different numerical techniques: Inertia relief and Modal dynamic analyses, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 14(52) (2020) 67-81, ‏ https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.06.

6. K. Reza Kashyzadeh, G.H. Farrahi, A. Ahmadi, M. Minaei, M. Ostad Rahimi, S. Barforoushan, Fatigue life analysis in the residual stress field due to resistance spot welding process considering different sheet thicknesses and dissimilar electrode geometries, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications 237(1) (2023) 33-51, https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207221101069.

7. H. Ueda, H. Fujimoto, S. Kikuchi, T. Okada, M. Fukumoto, K. Okamura, E. Nakayama, M. Yasuyama, Finite element simulation of resistance spot welding process for automotive steel, Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Technical Report 119 (2018) 103–114.

8. B. Sadeghian, A. Taherizadeh, T. Salehi, B. Sadeghi, P. Cavaliere, Simulation and microstructure prediction of resistance spot welding of stainless steel to carbon steel, Metals 12(11) (2022) 1898, https://doi.org/10.3390/met12111898.

9. A. Anca, A. Cardona, J. Risso, V.D. Fachinotti, Finite element modeling of welding processes, Appl. Math. Model. 35 (2011) 688–707, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.026.

10. I. Sattari-Far, M.R. Farahani, Effect of the weld groove shape and pass number on residual stresses in butt-welded pipes, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 86 (2009) 723–731, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2009.07.007.

11. D. Deng, H. Murakawa, Numerical simulation of temperature field and residual stress in multi-pass welds in stainless steel pipe and comparison with experimental measurements, Comput. Mater. Sci. 37 (2006) 269–277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.07.007.

12. V.G. Garcia, I. Mejía, F.R. Calderon, J.A. Benito, J.M. Cabrera, FE thermo-mechanical simulation of welding residual stresses and distortion in Ti-containing TWIP steel through GTAW process, J. Manuf. Process. 59 (2020) 801–815, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.042.

13. G. H. Farrahi, K.R. Kashyzadeh, M. Minaei, A. Sharifpour, S. Riazi, Analysis of resistance spot welding process parameters effect on the weld quality of three-steel sheets used in automotive industry: experimental and finite element simulation, IJE Transactions A: Basics 33(1) (2020) 148–157, https://doi.org/10.5829/IJE.2020.33.01A.17.

14. Z. Mikno, Z. Bartnik, Heating of electrodes during spot resistance welding in FEM calculations, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 16 (2016) 86–100, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2015.09.005.

15. Y. Li, Z. Wei, Y. Li, Q. Shen, Z. Lin, Effects of cone angle of truncated electrode on heat and mass transfer in resistance spot welding, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 65 (2013) 400–408, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.06.012.

16. S. Ao, C. Li, Y. Huang, Z. Luo, Determination of residual stress in resistance spot-welded joint by a novel X-ray diffraction, Measurement 161 (2020) 107892, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107892.

17. X. Wan, Y. Wang, P. Zhang, Numerical simulation on deformation and stress variation in resistance spot welding of dual-phase steel, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 92 (2017) 2619–2629, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0191-7.

18. R. Moharrami, B. Hemmati, Numerical stress analysis in resistance spot-welded nugget due to post-weld shear loading, J. Manuf. Process. 27 (2017) 284–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.05.007.

19. G.H. Farrahi, A. Ahmadi, K.R. Kashyzadeh, Simulation of vehicle body spot weld failures due to fatigue by considering road roughness and vehicle velocity, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 105 (2020) 102168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102168.

20. M. Bayir, E. Yücel, T. Kaya, N. Yıldırım, Spot welding parameter tuning for weld defect prevention in automotive production lines: an ML-based approach, Information 14(1) (2023) 50, https://doi.org/10.3390/info14010050.

21. P. Muthu, Optimization of the process parameters of resistance spot welding of AISI 316l sheets using Taguchi method, Mech. Mech. Eng. 23 (2019) 64–69, https://doi.org/10.2478/mme-2019-0009.

22. M. Maalouf, Z. Barsoum, Failure strength prediction of aluminum spot-welded joints using kernel ridge regression, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 91 (2017) 3717–3725, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0070-2.

23. S. Chokkalingham, N. Chandrasekhar, M. Vasudevan, Predicting the depth of penetration and weld bead width from the infrared thermal image of the weld pool using artificial neural network modeling, J. Intell. Manuf. 23 (2012) 1995–2001, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0526-4.

24. Y. Luo, C. Li, H. Xu, Modeling of resistance spot welding process using nonlinear regression analysis and neural network approach on galvanized steel sheet, Adv. Mat. Res. 291–294 (2011) 823–828, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.291-294.823.

25. P. Kah, J. Martikainen, P. Layus, Methods of evaluating weld quality in modern production (Part 1), Mechanika, Proceedings of 16th International Conference, At: Kaunis, Lithuania (2011) 164–169, https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1413.9685.

26. P. Kah, J. Martikainen, M. Pirinen, Methods of evaluating weld quality in modern production (Part 2), Mechanika, Proceedings of 16th International Conference, At: Kaunis, Lithuania (2011) 170–175, https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2462.5440.

27. M. Acebes, R.D. Molina, I. Gauna, N. Thorpe, J.C. Guerro, Development of an automated ultrasonic inspection device for quality control of spot welds, 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (WCNDT 2016), 13-17 June 2016 in Munich, Germany (WCNDT 2016), 21(7) (2016) 1–8.

28. N. Amiri, G.H. Farrahi, K.R. Kashyzadeh, M. Chizari, Applications of ultrasonic testing and machine learning methods to predict the static and fatigue behavior of spot-welded joints, J. Manuf. Process. 52 (2020) 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.01.047.

29. E. Ghafarallahi, G.H. Farrahi, N. Amiri, Acoustic simulation of ultrasonic testing and neural network used for diameter prediction of three-sheet spot welded joints, J. Manuf. Process. 64 (2021) 1507–1516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.012.

30. L. Hua, B. Wanga, X. Wanga, X. Hea, S. Guan, In-situ ultrasonic detection of resistance spot welding quality using embedded probe, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 267 (2019) 205–214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.12.008.

31. A. Moghanizadeh, Evaluation of the physical properties of spot welding using ultrasonic testing, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 85 (2016) 535–545, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7952-y.

32. F. Chen, S. Sun, Z. Ma, G.Q. Tong, X. Huang, Effect of weld nugget size on failure mode and mechanical properties of microscale resistance spot welds on Ti–1Al–1Mn ultrathin foils, Adv. Mech. Eng. 10(7) (2018) 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018785283.

33. H. Moshayedi, I. Sattari-Far, Numerical and experimental study of nugget size growth in resistance spot welding of austenitic stainless steels, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212 (2012) 347–354, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.09.004.

34. Y. Lu, A. Peer, T. Abke, M. Kimchi, W. Zhang, Subcritical heat affected zone softening in hot-stamped boron steel during resistance spot welding, Mater. Des. 155 (2018) 170–184, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.067.

35. M. Pouranvari, S.P.H. Marashi, Failure mode transition in AHSS resistance spot welds. Part I. Controlling factors, Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 528(29–30) (2011) 8337–8343, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.017.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-06

How to Cite

High-cycle fatigue behavior and chemical composition empirical relationship of low carbon three-sheet spot-welded joint: An application in automotive industry. (2023). Journal of Design Against Fatigue, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.62676/p7x1cn02